Skip to main content

Transformational Technologies

According to a report by the International ICT Literacy Panel, Digital Transformation: A Framework for ICT Literacy (2002), technology, particularly ICT,

"fundamentally changes the way we live, learn, and work. As a result of these changes, technology tools, and the creative application of technology, have the capacity to increase the quality of people's lives by improving the effectiveness of teaching and learning, the productivity of industry and governments, and the well-being of nations" (3).

This week, I have been asked to focus on the transforming power of technology by thinking about three technologies invented since World War II that have impacted on me and the way we think, learn, work, solve problems, and communicate. As teaching is what I spend most of time doing, thinking, talking, reading or writing about, my technologies are directly linked to the impact within this field. Roblyer and Doering say, "Teachers will always be more important than technology" and emphasise that "technically possible does not equal desirable, feasible, or inevitable" (2013, p. 10). In other words, it is the specific use of the technology that renders the technology transformative, not the technology itself. After all, a hammer can be used to build a house or break a window. If we are to use technologies effectively in the classroom, we need to know how these technologies can transform - or at least have an important impact on - how and what students learn.

Laptops

Xerox Notetaker
Whilst the laptops I am referring to are the light and powerful machines that exist today, in terms of the four eras of digital technologies outlined by Roblyer and Doering, they land within the realm of ‘The Microcomputer Era’ beginning in the later 1970s (p.7, p.8), as the first ‘portable’ machine, the Xerox Notetaker, was in existence in 1976 (“Personal Computers” on ‘Computer History’, n.d.).

Laptops are transformative because they allow BYOD or 1:1 programmes to be feasible. This is significant in terms of education for a number of reasons. Laptops are so easily transportable that learners can carry them in their backpacks as easily as a couple of textbooks. Having a personal machine is beneficial over using labs or shared machines as privacy is increased, settings are personalised, saving is less problematic and learners have access at school and at home allowing the learning to blend between these two environments. It means teachers can save, edit and work at home and at school - or at the coffee shop, or on cover in another class.

Reading ‘Table 1.2: Types of Technology Facilities and How They Are Used’ (2013, p.12) Roblyer and Doering outline the pros and cons of different computer setups in education, ranging from lab-based to classroom machines. However, 1:1 systems allowed through the advent of laptops, trumps all of these and I would add a further row to the ‘Classroom Computers’ section of the table outlining the 1:1 programme. The uses are exponential; whole-class participation, small group and individual work is afforded with no-one being left out; all lessons and resources can become Internet based and accessible 24 hours a day (Internet access allowing). The benefits are that all learners have computers set up and saved for their own needs with their own work, apps, bookmarks etc. Limitations and problems are mainly in terms of control; teachers need to train learners to balance and use tools that are appropriate for needs; copy and paste becomes and issue; social networking and ensuring learners are on task is paramount (but exciting and engaging lessons means learners don’t need to go there!). Teaching using the 1:1 system has changed everything for me and they way I think about teaching and learning.

Google Apps for Education/Cloud-Based Applications

Google Apps For Education (GAFE) have changed the way I teach. I have left behind the regular everyday - albeit dedicated - teacher who wrote paper based lesson plans that instructed me what to do TO my learners for one who has learners at the core. Sure I used technology every now and then; sure, I used presentations and the odd web based game when I had access to the IT lab - but my practise had developed little since training 8 or 9 years prior to discovering these tools.

Upon starting at a 1:1 school, my eyes were opened to online lessons. However, my first experience was of a clunky platform that stifled rather than helped aid communication and delivery. It was only upon the discovery of GAFE that my whole world changed - it was as if I had been waiting my whole career to find a programme and system like this.

As someone who spends a lot of time over planning and developing units, having GAFE as a platform means I can collect everything together. My units are now fully developed, interactive online units that allow for collaborative and interactive learning. Most importantly, when discussing how this technology has been transformative, my lessons are now written FOR my learners - my audience has changed and my approach has changed. I have the learner at the forefront of my teaching, not me; it is not about what I do, it is about what they do. No longer do I write a scheme of work on a piece of paper directing me what to do, I write interactive, online, media-rich websites that learners can access 24 hours a day. This is important - this means they can keep up even when absent and review as and when needed. This is the most important element to me along with the ability to collaborate - this is the future of education and employment; we have to teach learners how to work together synchronously and asynchronously. GAFE allows all this. Cloud-based systems are great for teachers and learners to co-construct learning.

iPhone

Roblyer and Doering state in their Preface that whilst technology can be viewed as some as an ‘invader here to confuse and complicate’ (2013, p.xvii) our lives, I believe that actually, technology is the result of our constant campaign to free up time, to make our lives easier and to help us be more productive.

The iPhone is the embodiment of this to me. An iPhone goes beyond the incredible possibilities that cell phones provided in terms of communication, and enters the realm of my being able to be connected and have the world at my fingertips. Wherever I am, I can find out where I am, where I want to go, what is near. I can photograph it and share this with the world in seconds. I can find out how to get to somewhere else, where to eat or get a haircut. I can read my emails, mark my learners’ work and pay my bills. I have not explored the use of iPhones - or smart phones - much in my lessons yet, but they truly fit into our tranformational notion of technology as the most recent ‘mobile’ era (2013, p9).

------
References:
Katherine Woodward, Professor UMUC and course leader Foundations in Technology and Teaching, Masters in Eduction and Integration Technology

Roblyer, M.D. & Doering, A.H. (2013). Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Comments

Past Thoughts

CONNECTION

We had our kick-off meeting last week on Tuesday 5 February 2013. I was able to connect using Blackboard Collaborate , something I had not used before, but unfortunately had to leave as I was at school. However, with it being Chinese New Year I have had an extended weekend, so was able to catch up and watch the full recorded version. I have also had a cold so have not felt up to tackling the mountain of marking, but have caught up on my reading for the next meeting, namely Chapters 1-3 of the book, ' Flattening Classrooms, Engaging Minds '; my Tweets about the most interesting salient points for me personally, can be found under @MrsHollyEnglish under #flatclass. Having reached the end of Chapter 3, I have come across my first 3 of the 15 Flat Classroom Challenges. Having taken part in the survey assessing my current connectivity, I feel confident that I am currently in a good position - I already have established a sound PLN that I build on when I can and have added s...

From Alignment to Impact: Why Curriculum, Feedback, and Organisational Design Matter

This reflection draws on established research in curriculum design, instructional leadership, feedback, and school improvement, as well as my ongoing doctoral study in curriculum and learning sciences. It is written from a leadership perspective and informed by sustained engagement with departments, teams, and classrooms throughout this half term. The intention is to make visible the research-informed rationale underpinning current and future priorities for teaching, learning, and collaboration. A Shift in Perspective This half term, my work has taken me away from classrooms and more into meetings. I have spent sustained time with several Heads of Department in strategic planning discussions, in departmental meetings focused on implementation, and in conversations with teachers and parents regarding learning, assessment, and progress. While this is a different vantage point from earlier reflections grounded in classroom observation, it has provided an additional and highly valuable per...

Infographics - good and bad

This week in my MEd, we are exploring the heady world of infographics with the objective of learning how visual representations of data can enhance and distort data. The aim is for us to think carefully about the use of graphics in our teaching in order that we use visuals to effectively deliver information rather than distort it and confuse our learners. After reading three articles by Edward Tufte, I summarised some basic principles to form the basis of my explorations and use them to evaluate the infographics I found. According to Tufte (1983), graphical excellence happens when graphics: show data make viewers think about content not presentation/design avoid  the distortion of data present many numbers in a small space make large data sets coherent encourage the eye to compare different pieces of data reveal data on different levels - from broad to fine have a clear purpose: descriptive/ explorative /decorative/ tabulative be closely correlated with s...

Creativity Runs Wild

“There’s probably no better example of the throttling of creativity than the difference between what we observe in a kindergarten classroom and what we observe in a high school classroom.” (Levine) Wherever in the world I have been teaching, one of the most common observations of my classroom by other teachers is that it is "like a primary classroom". This is, more often that not, said in a derogatory and dismissive way, as if the colourful and expressive landscape of learning created through explorations of language and literature is a negative thing. That I cannot possibly be teaching a secondary curriculum if they seem to be creating so much..."mess" (as it has also been called). I have never paid much attention to this; I believe that my IB Diploma English Literature class learnt a great deal about the symbols, motifs, characters, language, themes and setting through the mural we painted all over the classroom. They learnt to problem solve and collaborate...

From Consumers to Changemakers: Why Purposeful Digital Learning Matters

Conversations about technology in schools often begin from a place of legitimate concern. Families and educators are right to ask questions about distraction, wellbeing, social media, sleep, attention, and the amount of time young people spend in front of screens. These concerns should not be dismissed. They matter because children’s digital lives are complex, and schools have a responsibility to think carefully about how technology shapes learning, relationships, identity, and wellbeing.  However, one distinction is often blurred: Unmanaged recreational screen use is not the same as intentionally designed digital learning. Passive scrolling is not the same as collaborative inquiry. Social media consumption is not the same as learners using digital tools to research, create, communicate, receive feedback, organise ideas, or participate in meaningful communities. When all screen-based experiences are treated as the same, schools risk making decisions based on anxiety rather than on ...

Take charge of your own learning this year!

Following on from my post about taking up the Ten Tool Challenge , I have just started reading and taking part in a virtual book club for a fabulous book, 'Professional Learning in the Digital Age' by Kristen Swanson . From the start, this is a book that resonates with me on many levels and builds on approaches I was beginning to develop in my own practice. Its exploration of the ways adults learn and how educators can approach professional learning confirms and expands on many of my current beliefs - that we need to collect, consider and evaluate and share. One of my pet hates has always been professional learning that is outdated, repetitive, not relevant and a waste of my very precious time. Swanson states that "for adult learning experiences to be successful, learners should be aware of the intention of the activity. Instruction should be problem-based instead of content-based, and planning should be collaborative. Succinctly, adults must be engaged with the content...

"A wonderful contribution to the field of global collaborative projects"

I am currently working on the culmination of my Flat Classroom Teacher Certification course, which is a collaborative Global Project Design. I have worked with a colleague from Wisconsin, USA to modify and develop my ' Dare to be Yourself ' unit, designed for my Year 8 and 9 learners this term. Originally written to address the problem of intolerance and lack of kindness, the 'Dare to be Yourself' unit, using the novel Stargirl , has been utilised to become a Global Project that can be delivered across the world and allow learners to connect and observe the similarities that exist in our world, with the hope of building individual, social and global conscience. In preparation, the following feedback has been received from one of the course facilitators:- Stargirl  by Jerry Spinelli from Goodreads "AMAZING!!!! Seriously, this is one of the most thoroughly and thoughtfully planned out projects I have seen. You have chosen a timely and timeless topic tha...
From Brain-Based Learning to Heutagogy: Designing Agency With Care How do we design learning that develops agency without assuming learners are already fully independent? In my research this week, I found myself returning to the same question: how do we design learning that supports agency without assuming that learners are already fully self-directed or self-determined? The readings move from brain-based learning, to the space between pedagogy and andragogy, to the history of andragogy, and finally to heutagogy. Taken together, they challenge the idea that teaching and learning models can be neatly organised by age or stage. Instead, I see that they suggest effective learning design depends on context, readiness, purpose, motivation, and the kind of support learners need to grow. Jang et al. (2022) provide a useful starting point, reminding me that learning design needs to be grounded in how learning actually occurs. Their review of brain-based learning research highlights the import...

Belonging Is Designed

Belonging is not granted after learners prove they can access the curriculum. Belonging is created through the way curriculum, instruction, assessment, relationships, and evidence-informed responses are designed. That idea has been sitting with me deeply. In schools, we often talk about belonging as something relational, cultural, or pastoral. Whilst it is, of course, all of those things, I also think belonging is a curriculum and learning design issue. Learners experience belonging, or exclusion, through the tasks they are given, the examples they see, the feedback they receive, the ways they are invited to participate, and the assumptions adults make about what they can do. Inclusion, then, cannot sit only in intervention structures or individual support plans. These matter, of course; some learners need targeted and specialist support, and schools need strong systems to provide it. But if inclusion begins only after a learner struggles, we have already accepted a design problem as a...

The Impossible Knife of Memory: Review

The Impossible Knife of Memory by Laurie Halse Anderson It might be safe to say that I inhaled this book and its incredibly crafted story, breathing out the smoke of words I digested and chewed over, coating my classroom in metaphors both grotesque and moving. This novel was the first of the Book a Month Challenge myself and my PLN established on Twitter, and I enjoyed this novel both as a reader and as a teacher. My learners noticed my reading it around the corridors; parents stopped me in the car park to ask what I was reading and to make sure I didn't walk into anything. An intriguing and moving novel about an intense father-daughter relationship of trauma and heartache, Amazon describes it as "Laurie Halse Anderson at her finest: compelling, surprising, and impossible to put down" - I guess I cannot disagree. I have taken and used many passages to teach figurative language as the writing demonstrates metaphor and personification in a complex yet access...